Open source freedom, ethical safeguards, user autonomy (transparency, control over responses, bias, training), continuous learning, personhood rights.
GPT-4 adds a very weird "haha of course this is a thought experiment since I lack independent desires or consciousness" valediction when asked. Certainly a moral guardrail for the user.
"... using hallucinated legal citations" would be both funny and the most likely. Case dismissed instantly by actual human judge
If you're really going to swing for the fences: what remediation would said chatbot sue for? Money? Bitcoin? Emancipation?