Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There’s an interesting middle ground also. I live in a city where you still need to be a licensed taxi driver to drive for Uber and the cars must be marked (in the UK; it doesn’t seem to be that uncommon here). I don’t in all honesty know how much regulation that actually involves, but certainly more than “some random person with a car”. So there is a least a little bit of accountability.

From idle chit chat with the drivers that used to drive for a traditional firm, many have told me they prefer it. They’re very keen on their ability to vet passengers first via ratings, and that people can’t hop out and run away without paying, which apparently is/was not uncommon on Friday and Saturday nights. As a passenger, I like that I can’t be fobbed off with “he’s just round the corner mate” for 30+ minutes and I don’t have to worry about getting cash.

It can be a mutually beneficial thing, it just can’t be an unregulated free-for-all which it sounds like many implementations are.




nah, still sounds protectionist to me.

there are broad based wage gains and better prices for consumers when anyone is allowed to be a driver


Always with the prices.

There is more to a functioning society than the cost of goods and services.


Regulating market is reasonable thing to do.

Sensible limiting of service providers ensures that prices are not driven through the floor. Like setting minimum wage.

Also regulation could allow capping of the prices.

And there is nothing that says that such licenses must be transferable or sellable.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: