> this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private.
I've heard the arguments, so if you're thinking you're going to win an argument with me about whether this means anything or not, you're not; but supplemental information about why what's printed on our money doesn't mean it's legally money to pay a debt to a doctor, go for it.
I don’t think you understand how the system works. Or perhaps you do, but fantasize that reality were different.
First, in a non-urgent situation, you’re going to be asked about payment prior to service, and they may refuse to treat you if you can’t pay.
Second, in an emergency situation where you’re unable to provide affirmative assent, you’ll be liable for costs under the doctrine of quantum meruit (quasi-contract). If you don’t pay, the provider can sue you, in which case, the court may force you to pay on their terms.
I do understand the situation, thank you for the light insult, but I do go to the doctor in the US and in the both your first and second examples I've had my own different experience than you.
Well, what happened? It may well be that you visited someone who was generous, and they didn't exercise their rights to the fullest extent. Generosity is always an option a provider can extend, but it's not something a patient can demand.
