Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Probably.

Given the systemic corruption elsewhere, I can’t summon anger about this until I can verify if the utility is necessary and uniquely provided by Starlink. If so, then this is just bad optics. If not, it should be aggressively fought.




If it were “uniquely provided” by Starlink, how do you think Verizon got the award?


Were they unable to fulfill the contract?

As I said, I don’t have the full context here.


It’s a 15 year contract awarded in 2023 so it may be too early to tell. The strongest public claims that Verizon isn’t capable comes from their competitor so those claims should probably be taken with a boulder of salt until more information is made available.


This has nothing to do with Verizon.

All these arguments (and this article) come from a place of ignorance)


Care to elaborate? I think the more salient issue is the contracting process, not any particular company.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: