Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Reproduction is boring, but it would often happen incidentally to building off someone else's results.

You tell me that this reaction creates X, and I need X to make Y. If I can't make my Y, sooner or later it's going to occur to me that X is the cause.

Like I said, I know it's never that easy. Bench work is hard and there are a million reasons why your idea failed, and you may not take the time to figure out why. You won't report such failures. And complicated results, like in sociology, are rarely attributable to anything.




That's true for some kinds of research but a lot of academic output isn't as firm as "X creates Y".

Replicability is overrated anyway. Loads of bad papers will replicate just fine if you try. They're still making false claims.

https://blog.plan99.net/replication-studies-cant-fix-science...




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: