Stepping back, would granting a time-limited exclusive license to the output of generative AI "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts"?
In other words is there important AI art that society would be missing out on because the originator deemed it not worth the effort without some protection against unauthorized copies being made?
In other words is there important AI art that society would be missing out on because the originator deemed it not worth the effort without some protection against unauthorized copies being made?