> But more to the point, you seem to be under the impression that Americans benefit on a personal level from our country's global empire. We really don't.
I am routinely puzzled at the simple ignorance of U.S. citizens decrying the benefits of being the global hegemon:
- global reserve currency: lower borrowing rates, allows us to set economic norms
- massive military and power projections: maintains stability and provides influence wherever it's deployed
- US culture: opens up the world market to US art and culture, all of which redounds to the benefit of industries and consumers inside the US.
These benefits extend to all our allies and generally created an epoch of peace unlike any that existed before (this is including all the wars the US elected to engage in).
You may not like all of the particulars (who would?), but there is no question US citizens are richer for our global power and reach.
>These people don't look like they're living in the epicenter of the world's most powerful and influential empire. It does not matter to them if Europe buys up the new f-47 or whatever.
They may not appreciate how much the military-industrial complex benefits them not, but I think they will experience directly how it had helped when the market is gone.
It's fair to decry US citizens' ignorance of the true extent of US dominance and how it affects the home front ... BUT combined with 40 years of increasing neoliberal austerity, it's not correct to equate the effects with a better way of life.
Instead I would say that US corporate interests and the wealthy undoubtedly benefit from US hegemony, and there is a more or less relentless effort to deny those benefits to the poor and middle class. The cost of living, especially rent or mortgage servicing, has drastically outpaced wage increases. Health care is in terrible shape with medical bankruptcy increasingly common, and outcomes way worse.
The MI complex is again something that Americans don't credit enough for economic stimulation, but if anything it just shows that a command economy works way better than neoliberal capitalists would have us believe.
Even "peace" is poorly distributed internally. A "volunteer army" in effect is one where those with means don't have to risk their lives supporting the latest US adventure.
I am routinely puzzled at the simple ignorance of U.S. citizens decrying the benefits of being the global hegemon:
- global reserve currency: lower borrowing rates, allows us to set economic norms
- massive military and power projections: maintains stability and provides influence wherever it's deployed
- US culture: opens up the world market to US art and culture, all of which redounds to the benefit of industries and consumers inside the US.
These benefits extend to all our allies and generally created an epoch of peace unlike any that existed before (this is including all the wars the US elected to engage in).
You may not like all of the particulars (who would?), but there is no question US citizens are richer for our global power and reach.
>These people don't look like they're living in the epicenter of the world's most powerful and influential empire. It does not matter to them if Europe buys up the new f-47 or whatever.
They may not appreciate how much the military-industrial complex benefits them not, but I think they will experience directly how it had helped when the market is gone.