I hardly find anything interesting about command-line, I grew up in a time where the command line was the only way to interact with home computers, it fails on me the interest on staying stuck in up to early 1980's computing model.
Xerox PARC is the future many of us want to be in, not PDP-11 clones.
Weird flex, most commands, utilities, server software and remote tools are going to be run are going to be from the command-line. All our System Administration of remote servers uses the command-line as well since exclusively deploying to Linux for 10+ years.
Sure you can happily avoid the command-line with a Linux Desktop and GUI Apps, although as a developer I don't see how I could avoid using the terminal. Even on Windows I was using WSL a lot, it's just uncanny valley and slow compared to a real Linux terminal.
> Weird flex, most commands, utilities, server software and remote tools are going to be run are going to be from the command-line.
It's not a weird flex. Weird flex is this: "The command-line is also super charged in Linux starting with a GPU-accelerated Gnome terminal/ptyxis and Ghostty running Oh My Zsh" and then listing a bunch of obscure personal preference tools that follow trends du jour.
That’s not a flex, it requires no skill to install software, they’re just some of the better tools you can install to boost productivity in Linux terminals. I doubt they’re obscure to any Linux CLI user who spent time on improving the default OOB UX of bash terminals.
And you just alias them, so you can keep using the core utility names to use them.
There are huge interoperability advantages to CLI and TUI tools. Composing them, using script(1) on them, etc, are much simpler than the same for GUI tools. They are also much easier to rapidly iterate on.
GUIs are very useful but they are not clearly better (or worse) than CLIs.
Xerox PARC is the future many of us want to be in, not PDP-11 clones.