> There is 0% of the exam which is trivially answerable.
That's true, but of course, not what I claimed.
The claim is that, given the ability to memorize an every mathematical result that has ever been published (in print or online), it is not so difficult to get 25% correct on an exam by pattern matching.
Note that this is skill is, by definition, completely out of the reach of any human being, but that possessing it does not imply creativity or the ability to "think".
That's true, but of course, not what I claimed.
The claim is that, given the ability to memorize an every mathematical result that has ever been published (in print or online), it is not so difficult to get 25% correct on an exam by pattern matching.
Note that this is skill is, by definition, completely out of the reach of any human being, but that possessing it does not imply creativity or the ability to "think".