I am not affiliated with `cg_gcc`, but I have contributed some tiny things here and there.

Currently, `cg_gcc` is within spitting distance of being able to bootstrap the compiler. There really are only 3(!) bugs that currently stop a stage 2 build.

I know for sure, because I found workarounds for them, and have a working stage 2 build. A stage 3 build requires a bit more RAM than I have, but, besides that, it is definitely possible.

Those 3 bugs are: 1. Lack of support for 128 bit SwitchInt terminators(Rust IR equivalent of switch). This is likely caused by an issue on the GCC side, since libgccjit rejects 128 bit labels provided by `cg_gcc`. 2. A semantic difference between Rust's `#[inline(always)]` and `__attribute__((always_inline)) `. In Rust `#[inline(always)]` is a hint and works on recursive functions, but the GCC equivalent is not a hint, but a gurante, and does not work on recursive function. 3. `cg_gcc` miscompiles the Rust compiler's interner code if level 3 optimzations are enabled. The Rust compiler interner is quite complex, and does a lot of fiddly unsafe things, so it is the most likely to break. The exact cause of this issue is hard to pin down, but it can be worked around(by setting a lower opt level).

If you work around those issues, `cg_gcc` is able to successfully build the Rust compiler, at least on `x86_64 Linux`. Going from that to other architectures will still take time, but it is not as far away as some might think.

Thanks for the update. I think one important issue that also needs to be resolved is adding the GCC git tree as a subproject in Rust's git tree so that in the end, it will be possible to build a Rust compiler with a rustc_codegen_gcc backend without having to resort to external repositories.