I'm all for going against leadership when they purposely abuse people (like Zuckerberg telling his engineers to torrent copyrighted data for their LLM).

I would be in favour of checking what small companies do with licences. In my experience, the vast majority of startups blatantly abuse open source all the time.

But here it seems like it's all about an engineer who did some kind of attribution, but didn't do it correctly. And people are happy to say that it's all part of a big evil plan by Microsoft to take over the world.