Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Really? I think it's pretty normal to use your moral compass to take into account someone's work history during hiring decisions.

Did they work for a tobacco company, advertising harmful products to kids? I think that's bad, but you're right, it is a personal bias. Some argue that tobacco is actually fine.

Did they work for a buy-now-pay-later company which sneakily traps people into debt cycles? Again, I think that's bad, but it is just my opinion. And some people can argue that bnpl companies are good because they provide low cost* loans to consumers to buy Coachella tickets. *until you miss a payment then you're fucked.

Did they work for the Trump 2024 Campaign? Plenty of people voted for him so it's just like, my opinion man.

Or, did they work for Facebook, an antisocial, anticompetitive growth at all costs company which is absolutely a net drain on society. But hey - they did produce, er, buy, a messaging app which allows you to keep in touch with your family.

And I could go on and on.

There are plenty of smart people with a moral compass. I've been blessed to have worked with many - truly it has been a joy. There are also unscrupulous, smart people who will do any work as long as the money is there. I've also worked with those types, and it's not as pleasant. The best projects I've been a part of have had teams of people who truly care about the customer, they aren't trying to outsmart or trick them.






My prior comment is poorly worded around what my intent was.

I think it's important to separate the person from the machine.

   {company} has done {things I disagree with}, and {candidate} was working for them during this period.
vs

   {candidate} has done {things I disagree with}
Sure there is overlap and gray area, but, not "reject someone's resumè for having any {company}" level.

Good clarification, and I agree there's a venn diagram that doesn't totally look like a circle - but for me it nearly does look like a circle :)

Those comparisons are completely disingenuous

Lots of products came out of Facebook that have no moral implications at all


Every single product from facebook is or will be a vehicle for advertisement. Every vehicle for advertisement must be optimized for ad delivery. Optimizing for ad delivery chases attention above all else, including the end user's wellbeing.

At the end of the day, every facebook product must optimize for this singular business goal. Even if you don't see it at the moment you ship whatever feature, that is the truth.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: