Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Oh. Thanks, I get it now.

I guess while syntactic sugar is usually considered a functionality of the language itself, it surely is used in the way I meant it, too... random search result:

http://www.developerdrive.com/2012/05/an-introduction-to-und...

"In this part of the tutorial we’re going to take a look at some of the syntactic sugar that Underscore gives us to work with array-like collection."

And of course, even if I had been utterly wrong for using the term, my point would stand unmoved, but you know that :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: