Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I imagine it's less than you're suggesting, because they're not serving the files themselves, so their bandwidth would be relatively low compared to a photo or video sharing site.



Doesn't tracking millions of torrents require a massive amount of bandwidth? I'm no expert on bittorrent protocol, but I'm sure millions of clients pinging "I'm a seeder" or "I'm a leecher" adds up.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: