The controversy was that it generated a CPUID check for "GenuineIntel" at runtime, and fell back to extremely poorly generated code (like, 386-level, almost 286-level style) for all other CPUs, as far as I remember.
Borderline intentional sabotage against AMD, because they can obviously do better and I don't believe they are unaware of the capabilities of AMD CPUs.
(edit: And they should probably be checking for features instead of vendor IDs anyways. It's like checking for Firefox in the user-agent and sending animated GIFs instead of WebGL if you're on Chrome)
Borderline intentional sabotage against AMD, because they can obviously do better and I don't believe they are unaware of the capabilities of AMD CPUs.
(edit: And they should probably be checking for features instead of vendor IDs anyways. It's like checking for Firefox in the user-agent and sending animated GIFs instead of WebGL if you're on Chrome)
Here's some more info: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Intel_C%2B%2B_Compiler#Uncrip...