Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Give it time. I happen to think that bitcoin is still stabilizing. Whether it will stabilize at an even higher price than it is now, or "crash" and stabilize at a much lower price, I think it will eventually stabilize.



"I happen to think that bitcoin is still stabilizing."

Considering that this is the largest spike in the history of Bitcoin, I would like to know what makes you think that.

"I think it will eventually stabilize."

So do I, but that is because I think it will eventually fail (and stabilize at $0/BTC).


"Still stabilizing" means "has not yet stabilized". As in, it's trying to find a stability point.


Since Bitcoin's monetary supply is totally disconnected from economic activity, I wonder how it can ever stabilize (except perhaps by accident).


Isn't the point of bitcoin that its monetary supply is disconnected from economic activity? I thought the "mining" is supposed to be analogous to actual gold mining, so that increases in supply happen very slowly, get more difficult over time, and eventually cease completely. Obviously, many (perhaps most) people think that centralized government currencies (where the government can essentially increase the money supply at a whim) is the best system, but the point of bitcoin is to challenge that system.


Some people think the point of Bitcoin is decentralized detection of double spending and consider the deflationary goldbug mentality a flaw. One could imagine a decentralized inflationary cryptocurrency that uses a closed-loop algorithm to adjust the monetary supply (perhaps in response to difficulty, since the system already measures that). Of course, a stable exchange rate doesn't make speculators rich.


Right now a landgrab is going on. People want to hold some btc. At some point in the future, when everyone knows about btc and purchased as much as they want/can, the price will be more stable and grows only as much as new wealth is created by the global economy and new people are born.


> Right now a landgrab is going on. People want to hold some btc.

How's that different from tulips?

> the price will be more stable and grows only as much as new wealth is created by the global economy and new people are born.

Err...how so? Fiat money can do that, but how does bitcoin correlate to much of anything?


> How's that different from tulips?

The key difference is that the tulip burst happened in the past, so you can be quite certain that it was a speculative bubble.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: