Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

G-mail/Yahoo: moving your content to your e-mail address.

LinkedIn: moving their content to your e-mail address.

G-mail/Yahoo: Duplicating your content.

LinkedIn: Manipulating your content.

G-mail/Yahoo: E-mail providers.

LinkedIn: Social media provider.

G-mail/Yahoo: uses protocols as intended to provide service.

LinkedIn: uses hacks to provide service.

G-mail/Yahoo: No risk of compromising devices.

LinkedIn: Extreme risk of device compromise. Intentionally circumvents device security features. Multiple potential points of security breach (at proxy server, at web server, through rendering engine).

No comparison, really.




Everything they do differently is irrelevant as long as the user is asking them to do those things. If Gmail starts showing me fetish porn that's bad, if a fetish porn site does the same thing it's fine.

The only relevant difference is security/privacy, in which Google may be more trustworthy but even that is debatable, regardless of which side of the debate you land on.


Oh yes, and if the Linkedin IMAP MITM stops working for some reason I stop getting my emails?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: