Whuh? I don't think there's any sort of logical contradiction between:
"Information, such as research papers, that has been written for the purpose of being disseminated and paid for with tax money, should not be locked up"
and
"The government ought not spy on people."
What does the first one have to do with privacy at all?
"Information, such as research papers, that has been written for the purpose of being disseminated and paid for with tax money, should not be locked up"
and
"The government ought not spy on people."
What does the first one have to do with privacy at all?