CSS is already turing complete: - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2497146/is-css-turing-com...

This project doesn't use rule 110, it uses LESS which sorts out the logic while compiling and spits out the results in css.

I still say that doesn't count as long as you have to make the user click on all the cells. CSS by itself is capable of doing a single row of rule 110, but that's not enough.

It's not really any surprise that templates (or CSS) could be Turing complete, as all the lambda() function does is the same thing a template does - replacing the macros in a template with an argument.

This is actually an important lesson that is often missed: if the app you're writing gives the anonymous users any kind of find/replace macro capability, you're giving them a fully Turing complete language (though it's probably not easy, but that rarely stops anyone) and all the potential problems that can bring.

Languages of the future will be compiled to CSS in the same way that languages of the present are compiled to Javascript.

I get shivers just thinking about all the fun I can have breaking web semantics this way.

haha, thats a funny thought. I like CSS. I would love for it to have variables so I could consolidate changes and edit them via JS. Sorta like all the CSS-libraries.

o.o am i doing it??

CSS does have variables: http://www.w3.org/TR/css-variables/

Of course, this being the web you’re somewhat limited in browser support: http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-variables

I highly recommend checking out LESS -- even if you ignore all of it's features, being able to define variables alone is worth it :)

Yes i have been meaning too