FTFY. Moralistic "them kids today" alarmism is generally unwarranted. Evolution doesn't have a direction - it is merely change; to assign value judgment to this change historically has turned out to be shortsighted.
I agree. I also think the annoying alarmism is caused by not identifying the changes in intellectual habits.
For instance, in the past the high school math geeks all knew how to use a slide rule, and mastering it was an intellectually satisfying task. Now that slide rules have been replaced with calculators, the geeks instead know how to solve quadratic and differential equations with a technical calculator, which is an intellectually satisfying task to master.
The problem is that some of the "old school" can't really see the new skills and knowledge. They see only the lack of the old skills, and thus determine that X has been dumbed down and the kids today don't learn anything hard anymore.
Too lazy to subscribe. Is the gist "People can't write kanji anymore because computer-assisted input requires only passive knowledge"? If so, that was old news 20 years ago. Electrical typewriters were a huge thing in Japan, because mechanical ones could never produce the ~3000 characters they use.
FTFY. Moralistic "them kids today" alarmism is generally unwarranted. Evolution doesn't have a direction - it is merely change; to assign value judgment to this change historically has turned out to be shortsighted.