Meh... they can afford to let this one slip. It's one copyright, it's an embarrassment, it makes them $2m a year which is chicken feed for these sorts of companies. No expensive precedents will be set. Take it on the chin and move on.

The business with (possibly) mangling the PDF, however - I don't know whether that's perjury or perverting the course of justice or neither, but somebody ought to do hard time for that.

Which, of course, they won't.