
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll)
From: "Stefan Kanthak" <stefan.kanthak () nexgo de>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:49:27 +0200
Christian Sciberras wrote:
I can't take THAT seriously. At least not all of it. The part that interested me most:4. Should I find such vulnerability in many applications as I can? You should not. It's just a waste of time and your energy. Focus on most popular application types/classes.If, say, DWM.dll is exploitable, why not point *that* out rather than point out the many applications that are using it (wrongly)?
ANY DLL is/may be exploitable when referenced without its (often well-known) complete pathname. It IS necessary to name all the applications with unqualified references and to have them fixed by their authors/vendors. And there are MANY places where DLLs or EXEs are referenced, not just in binaries: the registry, DESKTOP.INI files (especially in the start menu and %ProgramFiles%), batch files (do you reference CMD.EXE always as %SystemRoot%\System32\CMD.EXE? No? It really doesn't hurt!), scripts (including AUTORUN.INF.-), ... Stefan
Oh, and the "report". For obvious reasons, I cannot include the full report. If I missed passing any detail, just ask and I'll fix right away. http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4801/31998033.png On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:10 PM, YGN Ethical Hacker Group <lists () yehg net> wrote:Hi Christian The reason I use "Clean" doesn't mean (or I'm not accusing) your Windows is infected. It's better to test DLL Hijacking in Clean Copy of Windows without any prior applications messup. Please take a look at http://core.yehg.net/lab/pr0js/texts/when_testing_for_dll_hijacking.txt We thank ACROS Security for bringing life to this issue. We'll take social responsibility as a security community to stop this issue as much as we could.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll), (continued)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 08)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) YGN Ethical Hacker Group (Sep 08)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 08)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) jf (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Mitja Kolsek (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) YGN Ethical Hacker Group (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) YGN Ethical Hacker Group (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Stefan Kanthak (Sep 13)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Rohit Patnaik (Sep 13)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) YGN Ethical Hacker Group (Sep 13)