
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll)
From: YGN Ethical Hacker Group <lists () yehg net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:03:55 +0800
Isn't *any* mechanism for code execution going to be effective with the use of social engineering? I mean, isn't that what we've known for years, that the weakest component of any security system is the users?
Yes, we know. Don't get us wrong. We're not telling Social Engineering. We're telling about Social Engineering Toolkit (SET) - http://www.offensive-security.com/metasploit-unleashed/SET What we mean is DLL Hijacking added a way to deliver payload to entice users to execute it. We've already drawn attention to SET authors and see how they will leverage this issue. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Rohit Patnaik <quanticle () gmail com> wrote:
DLL Hijacking is highly effective in combination with use of Social Engineering Toolkit.
-- Rohit Patnaik On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:36 AM, YGN Ethical Hacker Group <lists () yehg net> wrote:A vulnerability is a vulnerability. A SQL Injection is a type of Vulnerability. For each type of Vulnerability, there will be thousands of web applications that might be vulnerable to it. DLL Hijacking is same. We do each post rather than a list so that security vulnerability news site can get required detailed information as possible. If you don't want it, set filter for each post subject with "DLL Hijacking" or from our email. We can't underestimate such an easy flaw that leads to system compromise or command execution under user' privilege. Disabling remote share/WebDav is not a solution to DLL Hijacking at all. DLL Hijacking is highly effective in combination with the use of Social Engineering Toolkit. On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com> wrote:I'm getting a bit tired of throwing away these "security advisories". Really, someone should install a whole load of popular applications, ensure any of them load their own files, and finally, thanks to a mass dependency check, ensure DWM is being loaded at runtime. At least, it would be just one email/thread to trash._______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll), (continued)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 08)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) jf (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Mitja Kolsek (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) YGN Ethical Hacker Group (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Christian Sciberras (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) YGN Ethical Hacker Group (Sep 09)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Stefan Kanthak (Sep 13)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) Rohit Patnaik (Sep 13)
- Re: KeePass version 2.12 <= Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (dwmapi.dll) YGN Ethical Hacker Group (Sep 13)