Views

Two main arguments are used to attack the humanities. They can’t both be true, Katina L. Rogers writes.

Governing boards, and faculty looking to them for leadership, would be wise to remember the first rule in governance is to do no harm, Andrew Lounder writes.

A 2012 governance fight at the University of Virginia offers lessons for other faculty who might need to host “a little rebellion” on their campus, Charles Mathewes writes.

The difference matters, Julie J. Park writes.

An academic boycott is something faculty can do now, Gary Wilder writes.

Torbjørn Netland argues that peer review could potentially be improved by giving reviewers more choice.

Israel and Jewish studies programs cannot be pawns in Trump’s political attacks on higher education, Michael Brenner writes.

The Harvard doxing-truck debacle lays bare FERPA’s obsolescence in the digital age—and why protecting student privacy matters to their learning now more than ever, Sarah Hartman-Caverly writes.