And this response gets a dishonest "nuh uh it's not" without any justification as expected.

>There is no apparent interpretation of every verse.

There not being an apparent interpretation of 'alif lam meem' doesn't necessitate an esoteric interpretation, which is what I'm arguing.

>And verses you can't take literally: 18:85-86.

Linguistically it's very clear what the Arabic means here.

>So apparent just means a regurgitation of the Sunni interpretation.

No, it means the most obvious meaning of a statement according to the Arabic.

According to my apparent interpretation: First verse is meaningless. Latter verses are plain wrong.

If you want to make random claims I can't really stop you, idk what you want me to tell you