Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Less "red tape" ==> less accountability.



Red tape actually implies excessive standards that probably doesn't lead to any real accountability gains. You can have a lot of red tape with all bad rules, for example.


Your are correct.

But 'red-tape' is also what people call the rules that are effective, but prevent them from doing something nefarious that would be profitable.

'Red-Tape' = 'stopping me from doing something bad but would make me money, thus is taking away my freeeeeeeedooaaammmm'.

'Red-Tape' can also be non-productive rules that just hinder progress, but that isn't usually what is meant.


"'Red-Tape' can also be non-productive rules that just hinder progress, but that isn't usually what is meant."

You have no way of knowing one way or another.


I know when it is used as a slogan at political rallies, and they just simply call out things like "these regulations, so stupid, why can't we dump waste in the river, they are reducing our profits".

It is all about profit. The environment, or safety, anything in the way of profit is called '"red-tape" and is put there by some do-gooder.

So, yes, I think I can infer when someone talks about getting rid of 'red-tape' what they are "meaning". But that is also why I listed several categories of red-tape, since some 'red-tape' should be updated.


The First Law of Modern Politics is that nothing may ever be called by its right name. This applies recursively, i.e. it applies to metaphors and euphemisms as well as to their original referents. "Red tape" means "you are making it harder for me to steal money, cut that shít out."


It most certainly doesn't




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: