Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't see a problem with that. If party 'A' has something belonging to party 'B'. Just because the property is inaccessible or destroyed doesn't suddenly evaporate's 'A' responsibility for returning it.

Comcast should provide a grace period 30-60 days, but that's about it.




Agreed. Not sure why people see a problem with this simple principle.

It's not like they would be ok with Comcast saying "We're having cash flow issues, so we took the liberty of charging you double this month"


Not in this particular case, but sometimes I feel like "the customer is always right" has become a license to steal for some people.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: