L. D. Caskey, J. D. Beazley, Attic Vase Paintings in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

ADDENDA TO PART I

• No. 1. ARV. p. 55, Cerberus Painter no. 6. Fairbanks and Chase p. 58; Chase Guide p. 61.
• No. 2. ARV. p. 55, Cerberus Painter no. 1.
• No. 4. ARV. p. 27, manner of Euthymides, no. 3.
• No. 5. ARV. p. 49, Epiktetos no. 58. On the shape, Bloesch F.A.S. p. 138 note 219.
• No. 6. ARV. p. 48, Epiktetos no. 41. (After V.A.), Richter A.R.V.S. p. 43 fig. 12 and Byvanck De Kunst der Oudheid ii p. 350; Chase Guide p. 63.
• No. 7. ARV. p. 86, Elpinikos Painter no. 3. Now augmented by a fragment, identified by Kirsten, ex Leipsic, which gives the right elbow of Menelaos, with part of the line-border (Leipziger Vasen: Festgabe zur Winckelmannsfeier... Leipzig 1935 pl. 1 no. 1). For the subject compare the vase (plate or stemless cup?), by Oltos, in Odessa (Zap. Od. 22 pl. 3, 1, whence, redrawn, Ebert Südrussland im Altertum p. 203): the Odessa picture should not have been described in ARV. p. 35 no. 10 as merely 'warrior leading woman', since the names are inscribed, ΜΕΝΕΛΕ[ΟΣ] and ΗΕΛΕΝΕ. See also Kunze Olympische Forschungen ii p. 164.
• No. 8. ARV. p. 91, top: near the Carpenter Painter, but earlier than the vases assigned to him. On the shape, Bloesch F.A.S. p. 120 no. 8.
• No. 9. ARV. p. 49, Epiktetos no. 65. On the shape, Bloesch F.A.S. p. 124 no. 18. Add the reference to Caskey G. p. 183 fig. 138. For 'BSR. ii' read 'BSR. 11'.
• No. 10. ARV. p. 77, Hermaios Painter no. 1.
• No. 11. ARV. p. 77, Hermaios Painter no. 3. On the shape, Bloesch F.A.S. p. 119 no. 1 and p. 122.
• No. 12. ARV. p. 64, Euergides Painter no. 92; see AJA. 1944 pp. 57-8 (M. J. Milne).
• No. 13. ARV. p. 244 no. 16: manner of the Triptolemos Painter and probably an early work by the artist himself.
• No. 14. ARV. p. 30, Gales Painter no. 1. Chase Guide p. 62; detail (after Caskey), Richter A.R.V.S. fig. 41. On the shape see Haspels ABL. pp. 69-70.
• No. 15. On the shape see Haspels ABL. p. 74: she compares it with that of the arming lekythos in Agrigento, mentioned by Caskey on p. 11 and republished in ABL. (pl. 21, with pp. 70-4). As to drawing, the Boston lekythos may be counted as belonging to 'the wider circle of the Nikosthenes Painter' (ARV. pp. 104-6 and 951).
• No. 16. (After Caskey), Arch. class. 2 pl. 7, 2; detail of A, Kl. pl. 18, 4; Chase Guide p. 64. ARV. p. 121, Kleophrades Painter no. 7.
• No. 17. A, N.Y. Shapes p. 20, 2 = Richter and Milne fig. 167; B, Richter The Craft of Athenian Pottery p. 23 fig. 30; B, International Studio Feb. 1927 p. 25, 1 (J. S. Green, jr.); B, Lane Greek Pottery pl. 76, a: ARV. pp. 254 and 956, Brygos Painter no. 136.
• No. 18. ARV. p. 253, Brygos Painter no. 131; one figure (after Caskey), Jacobsthal Diskoi p. 3; (after Caskey) Chase Guide p. 69.
• No. 19. ARV. p. 255, Brygos Painter no. 151. A, Buschor Gr. Vasen p. 172; B, Neue Jahrbücher 10 (1934) pl. 2, 3. Two other Nolan amphorae by the Brygos Painter: ARV. p. 255 nos. 150 and 152. Hamm inv. 3690 is a fourth (AJA. 1947 pl. 63; Anz. 1948-9 pp. 133-6: on each side a warrior): this is the vase described by Heydemann in Bull. 1869 p. 191 no. 15: it was then in the Torrusio collection, and the provenience is therefore Nola. See also ARV. p. 956, middle.
• No. 20. ARV. p. 256, Brygos Painter no. 170. The mug Boston 97.606, mentioned on ii p. 21, middle, is ancient, but was originally black: the drawing is modern.
• No. 21. ARV. p. 256, Brygos Painter no. 163. After Caskey, Jb. 56 p. 41.
• No. 22. ARV. p. 255, Brygos Painter no. 143. Hirth Formenschatz 1908, 85; Richter and Milne fig. 178; Chase Guide p. 70. I take the opportunity of correcting an error in Minto Populonia pl. 53, 5 with pp. 191-2. Two fragments are figured there with the statement that I attribute them to Douris. Pl. 53, 5a is by the Brygos Painter, and is one of the two fragments composing ARV. p. 247 no. 17; the other fragment, unpublished, has, on one half of the exterior, the upper parts of a satyr to left and of a satyr dancing to right. Pl. 53, 5b in Populonia is not by the Brygos Painter: it is the fragment assigned to Douris in ARV. p. 291 no. 187.
• No. 23. ARV. p. 249, Brygos Painter no. 40. Last line but one: for 'fig. 20' read 'fig. 21'.
• No. 24. ARV. p. 250, Brygos Painter no. 68.
• No. 25. ARV. p. 262.
• No. 26. ARV. p. 252, Brygos Painter no. 111.
• No. 27. ARV. p. 265 ('very like the Brygos Painter, but possibly rather by the Foundry Painter'). I should now add it to the list of the Foundry Painter's vases as no. 29 bis. Now augmented