artists (see iii p. 9; Boston 03.790). In the developed technique, for instance in Euphronios or Euthymides, the first step in the painting is to outline the figure with a thick brush. The black pigment is a quick drier; and when the background comes to be filled in, this 'contour-band' does not merge with it, but remains distinguishable. It is naturally more obvious in those unfinished vases where the background was never filled in, but it is plain enough in nearly all vases. In the Andokides Painter the background is uniform and there is no contour-band to be seen. He did not begin that way, but by drawing the outline with a very thin brush.
In Achilles there is no relief-contour between the tip of the nose and the beard (including nostril and mouth), and none for the right hand or the feet. In Ajax, none for face, right thumb, right elbow, knee of greave, feet. Within the figures, the ears, the marks on the knees, and the lines near the lower edge of the corslet are without relief. Over other details one hesitates: the relief-line instrument may be used, but perhaps with the pigment diluted, so that a full relief-line is not produced. I am sorry not to be more explicit: one can nearly always be certain what is relief-line and what is not: here it is not so easy, and the notes I have taken at various times do not all agree.
The graffito under the foot of the vase is A\/. Hackl (Münchener arch. Studien p. 36) takes this to be the same as on the bilingual amphorae Louvre F 204, London B 193, and Munich 2301, but it is different. No doubt Etruscan.
I used to think of this as an early work of the Andokides Painter, but see now that it belongs to his middle period. The style is less mincing than in his early amphorae Louvre G 1 and Berlin 2159.
Kunst der Oudheid, 2, p. 328, pl. 73 (figs. 284-285); Brommer 1960, pp. 252 (no. A 3), 254 (no. B 1); Carpenter 1962, p. 89, fig. 22; Palmer 1962, pp. 87-88, fig. 76; A. W. Byvanck, BABesch 38 (1963), p. 86; ARV2, p. 1617; H. Marwitz, ÖJh 46 (1961-63) (Hauptblatt), pp. 82, 93; K. Schauenburg, JdI 80 (1965), pp. 93, 96; Knauer 1965, pp. 9, 12, figs. 11-12; J. G. Szilágyi, Bulletin du Musée Hongrois des Beaux-Arts 28 (1966), pp. 18 (note 11, no. 7), 21-22, 28; Richter 1966, p. 46, figs. 259-260; CVA, 1970, Munich, 7, p. 14 (E. Kunze-Götte); Para., pp. 113 (no. 2), 320 (no. 7); G. Becatti, StMisc 19 (1971-1972), p. 8; P. Colafranceschi Cecchetti, ibid., p. 30, pls. 60 (fig. 173), 61 (fig. 177), 62 (fig. 178); I. K. Raubitschek, AJA 77 (1973), p. 243; S. Karusu, AM 88 (1973), p. 60, note 19; E. R. Knauer, 1973, 125 BWPr, p. 22, notes 17-18; Brommer 1973, pp. 335 (no. A 11), 338 (no. B 1); Mommsen 1975, p. 78, note 379; Boardman 1975, pp. 17, 19 (fig. 2, 1-2), 217-218, 232, 242; CVA, 1976, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 4, p. 19, under no. 98.8.13 (M. B. Moore and D. von Bothmer); C. De Palma, ArchCl 29 (1977), p. 56; J. Boardman, AJA 82 (1978), p. 19, note 43; Schefold 1978, pp. 247-249 (fig. 333), 281, 317; Pinney & Ridgway 1979, p. 292, under no. 149, note 4 (J. McCallum); Vermeule 1979, pp. 80-81 (fig. 35), 231 (note 73); Moore 1980, p. 420; LIMC, 1981, I, 1, pp. 97 (no. 392), 101 (no. 421), 102-103, 199, I, 2, pl. 96, illus. (A. Kossatz-Deissmann); Kroll 1982, p. 71, note 30; S. Woodford, 1982, JHS 102, pp. 173, 181, nos. A 3 and B 3; Böhr 1982, p. 64, note 190; Beazley Addenda 1, pp. 32 (with incorrect ref. to Boardman, Athenian Black Figure vases, fig. 161.1, 2, ref. to B. Cohen, Attic Bilingual Vases, pl. 7, 2-3), 71; Moon 1983, p. 145, note 100 (G. F. Pinney); H. R. Immerwahr, AA 1986, p. 200, note 15; D. von Bothmer, Gnomon 60 (1988), p. 181; Beazley 1989, pp. 18-19; Beazley Addenda 2, pp. 65, 149; Burow 1989, p. 33; B. Cohen, Hesperia 60 (1991), p. 490, note 112. Exhibited: Fogg Art Museum, March 1-April 5, 1972 (Buitron 1972, pp. 36-37, no. 14, 3 illus.).
Kunst der Oudheid, 2, p. 328, pl. 73 (figs. 284-285); Brommer 1960, pp. 252 (no. A 3), 254 (no. B 1); Carpenter 1962, p. 89, fig. 22; Palmer 1962, pp. 87-88, fig. 76; A. W. Byvanck, BABesch 38 (1963), p. 86; ARV2, p. 1617; H. Marwitz, ÖJh 46 (1961-63) (Hauptblatt), pp. 82, 93; K. Schauenburg, JdI 80 (1965), pp. 93, 96; Knauer 1965, pp. 9, 12, figs. 11-12; J. G. Szilágyi, Bulletin du Musée Hongrois des Beaux-Arts 28 (1966), pp. 18 (note 11, no. 7), 21-22, 28; Richter 1966, p. 46, figs. 259-260; CVA, 1970, Munich, 7, p. 14 (E. Kunze-Götte); Para., pp. 113 (no. 2), 320 (no. 7); G. Becatti, StMisc 19 (1971-1972), p. 8; P. Colafranceschi Cecchetti, ibid., p. 30, pls. 60 (fig. 173), 61 (fig. 177), 62 (fig. 178); I. K. Raubitschek, AJA 77 (1973), p. 243; S. Karusu, AM 88 (1973), p. 60, note 19; E. R. Knauer, 1973, 125 BWPr, p. 22, notes 17-18; Brommer 1973, pp. 335 (no. A 11), 338 (no. B 1); Mommsen 1975, p. 78, note 379; Boardman 1975, pp. 17, 19 (fig. 2, 1-2), 217-218, 232, 242; CVA, 1976, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 4, p. 19, under no. 98.8.13 (M. B. Moore and D. von Bothmer); C. De Palma, ArchCl 29 (1977), p. 56; J. Boardman, AJA 82 (1978), p. 19, note 43; Schefold 1978, pp. 247-249 (fig. 333), 281, 317; Pinney & Ridgway 1979, p. 292, under no. 149, note 4 (J. McCallum); Vermeule 1979, pp. 80-81 (fig. 35), 231 (note 73); Moore 1980, p. 420; LIMC, 1981, I, 1, pp. 97 (no. 392), 101 (no. 421), 102-103, 199, I, 2, pl. 96, illus. (A. Kossatz-Deissmann); Kroll 1982, p. 71, note 30; S. Woodford, 1982, JHS 102, pp. 173, 181, nos. A 3 and B 3; Böhr 1982, p. 64, note 190; Beazley Addenda 1, pp. 32 (with incorrect ref. to Boardman, Athenian Black Figure vases, fig. 161.1, 2, ref. to B. Cohen, Attic Bilingual Vases, pl. 7, 2-3), 71; Moon 1983, p. 145, note 100 (G. F. Pinney); H. R. Immerwahr, AA 1986, p. 200, note 15; D. von Bothmer, Gnomon 60 (1988), p. 181; Beazley 1989, pp. 18-19; Beazley Addenda 2, pp. 65, 149; Burow 1989, p. 33; B. Cohen, Hesperia 60 (1991), p. 490, note 112. Exhibited: Fogg Art Museum, March 1-April 5, 1972 (Buitron 1972, pp. 36-37, no. 14, 3 illus.).