Chap XII.} |
680 |
Chap XII.} |
680 |
1 Sullivan's Maine, 384. Williamson, i. 557, &c. Hutch. Coll. Mass. Records, IV.
2 Chalmers, 488: ‘No assembly, of which the representatives of the people composed a constituent part, was allowed because none had been mentioned in the original grant.’ An assembly was regularly held. Williamson's Maine, i. 566, &c. The reason assigned is as unfounded as the statement in Chalmers. In the grant of 1639, the assent of the majority of the free holders is required for all acts of legislation. Hazard, i. 445. It is true, the proprietary supremacy of Massachusetts was unpalatable to many. Willis's Portland, i. 158. Maine Hist. Collections, i. 302.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.